Journal Information
Vol. 17. Issue 6.
Pages 722-723 (November - December 2013)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 17. Issue 6.
Pages 722-723 (November - December 2013)
Letter to the Editor
Open Access
Epidemiologic profile of Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in pregnant women attending prenatal care in a city of southern of Brazil
Visits
3214
Cássia Rejane Kruka, Otto Henry May Feuerschuetteb,
Corresponding author
otto.feurschuette@unisul.br

Corresponding author at: Vidal Ramos 100, Tubarão, SC, Brazil.
, Sheila Koetker da Silveirac, Mayara Cordazoa, Alberto Trapani Júniorc
a Bachelor degree of medicine from the University of Southern Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Tubarão, SC, Brazil
b Master of Health Sciences (UNISUL), Tubarão, SC, Brazil
c Master of Medical Sciences (UFSC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Table 1. Correlation between GBS culture results, demographic and obstetric characteristics of current pregnancy.
Full Text
Dear Editor,

The presence of Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) in the maternal genital tract is known to be responsible for significant neonatal morbidity and mortality rates, but it is usually asymptomatic. Maternal screening during pregnancy through the culture of vaginal and rectal secretions collected between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation allows the introduction of therapeutic interventions in a timely manner, reducing the frequency and severity of early-onset neonatal sepsis.1,2 Many countries have reduced morbidity and mortality rates from S. agalactiae infection by adopting universal screening at 35–37 weeks of gestation, and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis.3–5

A cross-sectional study was conducted between August and December 2011 to estimate the prevalence of streptococcal colonization in pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy and identify the factors potentially associated with colonization. Participants were recruited among consenting women at 35–37 weeks of gestation, attending antenatal clinics in the city of Tubarão, Brazil. A questionnaire was administered asking about socioeconomic status, and clinical and obstetrical data of current and past pregnancies. It also asked questions related to sexual behavior of pregnant women. Vaginal and anorectal secretion samples were collected, and all culture tests were performed at the same clinical laboratory. A culture method is still considered the gold standard of screening for bacterial colonization, being extremely effective and used by most countries, including the most developed.

The data were entered into Epidata version 3.1 and the SPSS software, version 17.0, was used to perform statistical analysis. The study included 118 pregnant women.

Findings in this study revealed that about one in four women were colonized with GBS, which is considered a high prevalence.2–4 Statistically significant differences were found in this study between colonization with GBS and factors such as black skin color, low household income, fever, antibiotic use and leukorrhea during current pregnancy, prolonged labor in a past pregnancy and multiple sexual partners. Although this was a cross-sectional study, these variables could be considered as risk factors associated with high prevalence of GBS colonization. There was no clear association between marital status, education level, and high rates of streptococcal colonization, even though less educated, unmarried pregnant women had a slightly higher prevalence than their counterparts (Table 1).

Table 1.

Correlation between GBS culture results, demographic and obstetric characteristics of current pregnancy.

Variables  Total  Positive culture  Negative culture  p-Value 
  n (%)  n (%)  n (%)   
Skin color
Whites/not black  109 (92.4)  27 (84.4)  82 (95.3)  0.046a 
Black  9 (7.6)  5 (15.6)  4 (4.7)   
Marital status
Married/cohabiting  112 (94.9)  30 (93.7)  82 (95.3)  0.662b 
Single  6 (5.1)  2 (6.3)  4 (4.7)   
Household income
<2 minimum wages  13 (11)  8 (25)  5 (5.8)  0.003a 
>2 minimum wages  105 (89)  24 (75)  81 (94.2)   
Education
College degree  36 (30.5)  9 (28.1)  27 (31.4)  0.732a 
Other  82 (69.5)  23 (71.9)  59 (68.6)   
Fever (>38°C)
No  109 (92.4)  27 (84.4)  82 (95.3)  0.046a 
Yes  9 (7.6)  5 (15.6)  4 (4.7)   
Urinary infection
No  90 (76.3)  21 (65.6)  69 (80.2)  0.191a 
Yes  28 (23.7)  11 (34.4)  17 (19.8)   
Use of antibiotics
No  68 (57.6)  11 (34.4)  57 (66.3)  0.02a 
Yes  50 (42.4)  21 (65.6)  29 (33.7)   
Vaginal discharge
No  96 (81.4)  22 (68.7)  74 (86)  0.032a 
Yes  22 (18.6)  10 (31.3)  12 (14)   
Bleeding
No  114 (96.6)  30 (93.7)  84 (97.7)  0.295a 
Yes  4 (3.4)  2 (6.3)  2 (2.3)   
a

Pearson chi-square, 95% CI.

b

Fisher's exact test, 95% CI.

These findings suggest the need for the physicians to adopt a routine prenatal isolation of the micro-organism in culture tests, since knowledge of the prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women, and the most significant risk factors, is an important step toward the adoption of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, which can significantly reduce the complications resulting from GBS colonization.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References
[1]
CDC. Centers for Disease Control Prevention.
Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 59 (2010), pp. 1-32
[2]
A.S. Zusman, R.S. Baltomore, S.N.S. Fonseca.
Prevalence of maternal Group B streptococcal colonization and related risk factors in a Brazilian population.
Braz J Infect Dis, 10 (2006), pp. 242-246
[3]
M. Trijbels-Smeulders, G.A. Jonge, P.P.C.M. Jong, et al.
Epidemiology of neonatal GBS disease in the Netherlands before and after introduction of guidelines for prevention.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal, 92 (2007), pp. 271-276
[4]
T.T. Rocchetti, C. Marconi, V.L. Rall, et al.
GBS colonization in pregnant women: risk factors and evaluation of the vaginal flora.
Arch Gynecol Obstet, 283 (2011), pp. 717-721
[5]
V. Sharmila, N.M. Joseph, T. ArunBabu, et al.
Genital tract group B streptococcal colonization in pregnant women: a South Indian perspective.
J Infect Dev Ctries, 5 (2011), pp. 592-595
Copyright © 2013. Elsevier Editora Ltda.. All rights reserved
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools