Journal Information
Vol. 14. Issue 3.
Pages 225-229 (May - June 2010)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 14. Issue 3.
Pages 225-229 (May - June 2010)
Original article
Open Access
The evaluation of bacteriology in perianal abscesses of 81 adult patients
Visits
2985
Mehmet Ulug1,
Corresponding author
mehmetulug21@yahoo.com

Correspondence to: BSK Anadolu Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinic Microbiology, 43020 Kütahya, Turkey.
, Ercan Gedik2, Sadullah Girgin2, Mustafa Kemal Celen3, Celal Ayaz3
1 BSK Anadolu Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinic Microbiology, 43100 Kütahya, Turkey
2 Dicle University Medical School, Department of General Surgery, 21280 Diyarbakir, Turkey
3 Dicle University Medical School, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinic Microbiology, 21280 Diyarbakir, Turkey
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Abstract

Objective: Treatment of perianal abscesses requires prompt surgical drainage and antimicrobial therapy. However, we should encourage the selective use of antimicrobial agents on a case-by-case basis, especially because there is no evidence that uncomplicated perianal abscesses can be safely treated only with drainage. For this reason, it is important to identify the causative organisms; therefore, we accessed the microbiological analysis of these patients. Patients and methods: In this study, 81 consecutive adult patients with perianal abscesses, who presented at a university hospital in Diyarbakir from January 2004 to December 2006, were included. Clinical and laboratory data, and results of microbiological analysis were recorded. Results: All specimens, except seven, yielded bacterial growth. Escherichia coli, Bacteriodes spp., coagulase-negative Staphylococci, and Staphylococcus aureus were the most common isolated organisms. Conclusion: In contrast to other investigators, this study demonstrated that aerobic organisms are the predominant isolates in these infections.

Keywords:
perianal abscess
adult
bacteriology
aerobic bacteria
treatment
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1.]
N. Hyman.
Anorectal abscess and fistula.
Prim Care, 26 (1999), pp. 69-80
[2.]
P.J. Lunniss, P.J. Jenkins, G.M. Beser, L.A. Perry, R.K. Philips.
Gender differences in incidence of idiopathic fistula-in-ano are not explained by circulating sex hormones.
Int J Colorectal Dis, 10 (1995), pp. 25-28
[3.]
J. Glenn, D. Cotton, R. Wesley, P. Pizzo.
Anorectal infections in patients with malignant diseases.
Rev Infect Dis, 10 (1988), pp. 42-52
[4.]
I. Brook, E.H. Frazier.
Aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of wounds and cutaneous abscesses.
Arch Surg, 125 (1990), pp. 1445-1451
[5.]
I. Brook, E.H. Frazier.
The aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of perirectal abscess.
J Clin Microbiol, 35 (1997), pp. 2974-2976
[6.]
I. Brook.
Comparison of two transport systems for recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from abscesses.
J Clin Microbiol, 25 (1987), pp. 2020-2022
[7.]
I. Brook.
Recovery of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens in 12 years at two military hospitals.
J Clin Microbiol, 26 (1988), pp. 1181-1188
[8.]
I. Brook.
Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of infections after trauma in children.
J Accid Emerg Med, 15 (1998), pp. 162-167
[9.]
M.H. Whiteford, J. Kilkenny, N. Hyman, et al.
Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised).
Dis Colon Rectum, 48 (2005), pp. 1337-1342
[10.]
P.H. Gordon.
Anorectal abscess and fistula-in-ano.
Principles and Practice of Surgery of the Colon, Rectum and Anus,
[11.]
P.J. Lunniss, R.K. Philips.
Surgical assesment of acute anorectal sepsis is a better predictor of fistula than microbiological analysis.
Br J Surg, 81 (1994), pp. 368-369
[12.]
T. Toyonaga, M. Matsushima, Y. Tanaka, et al.
Microbiological analysis and endoanal ultrasonography for diagnosis of anal fistula in acute anorectal sepsis.
Int J Colorectal Dis, 22 (2007), pp. 209-213
[13.]
A.H. Al-Salem, W. Laing, V. Talwaker.
Fistula-in-ano in infancy and childhood.
J Pediatr Surg, 29 (1994), pp. 436-438
[14.]
S. Henrichsen, J. Christiansen.
Incidence of fistula-in-ano complicating anorectal sepsis: a prospective study.
Br J Surg, 73 (1986), pp. 371-372
[15.]
I. Brook, W.J. Martin.
Aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of perirectal abscesses in children.
Pediatrics, 66 (1980), pp. 282-284
[16.]
J.B. Albright, M.J. Pidala, J.R. Cali, et al.
MRSA-related perianal abscesses: an under recognized disease entity.
Dis Colon Rectum, 50 (2007), pp. 996-1003
[17.]
R.N. Enberg, R.H. Cox, V.F. Bury.
Perirectal abscess in children.
Am J Dis Child, 128 (1974), pp. 360-361
[18.]
R.W. Krieger, M.J. Chusid.
Perirectal abscess in childhood: a review of 29 cases.
Am J Dis Child, 133 (1979), pp. 411-412
[19.]
G. Nicholls, N.D. Heaton, A.M. Lewis.
Use of bacteriology in anorectal sepsis as an indicator of anal fistula: experience in a district general hospital.
J R Soc Med, 83 (1990), pp. 625-626
Copyright © 2010. Elsevier Editora Ltda.. All rights reserved
Download PDF
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools