Journal Information
Vol. 14. Issue 1.
Pages 116-120 (January - February 2010)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 14. Issue 1.
Pages 116-120 (January - February 2010)
Brief communications
Open Access
Quality of sputum in the performance of polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis
Visits
2475
Rosemeri Maurici da Silva1,
Corresponding author
rosemaurici@gmail.com

Correspondence to: Rua Moçambique, 852, Rio Vermelho, Florianópolis – SC CEP: 88060415.
, Maria Luiza Bazzo2, Mariana Chagas3
1 Pneumologist, Master in Medical Sciences and Doctor in Pneumology. Professor of the Medical School of the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina and Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina. Coordinator of the Program of Master's Degree in Health Sciences of the Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina
2 Doctor in Microbiology and Professor of the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
3 Master in Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Abstract
Setting

faster alternative techniques are required to improve the diagnosis and control of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Objective

To evaluate the sample quality in the performance of PCR for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Method

During one year, sputum samples were collected from 72 pulmonary tuberculosis patients and 12 non-tuberculosis controls, which were admitted to the Nereu Ramos hospital, Florianópolis city, Brazil. The samples were subjected to Ziehl-Neelsen-stained sputum smear microscopy and Lowestein-Jensen medium culture, which were defined as gold standard tests for mycobacteria, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Those samples that presented more than 40% of viable cells and less than 25% of epithelial cells were defined as high quality samples.

Results

PCR showed sensitivity of 55.6%, specificity of 41.7%, positive predictive value of 85.1%, negative predictive value of 13.5%, and accuracy of 53.6%. High quality samples showed sensitivity of 72.4%, specificity of 50%, positive predictive value of 91.3%, negative predictive value of 20%, and accuracy of 69.7%. Low quality samples showed sensitivity of 44.2%, specificity of 37.5%, positive predictive value of 79.2%, negative predictive value of 11.1%, and accuracy of 43.1%.

Conclusion

use of high quality samples improved significantly the PCR performance, especially on their sensitivity and positive predictive values.

Keywords:
tuberculosis
sputum
polymerase chain reaction
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1.]
Stop TB Partnership and WHO. Amsterdam Declaration to Stop TB, 2000 (www.stoptb.org/stop_tb_initiative/assets/documents/decla.pdf, accessed in November 2008).
[2.]
D. Yeboah-Manu, M.D. Yates, S.M. Wilson.
Application of a simple multiplex PCR to aid in routine work of the Mycobacterium reference laboratory.
J Clin Microbiol, 39 (2001), pp. 4166-4168
[3.]
M. Gallina, P. Troupioti, G. Rocco, G. Sensalari, E. Libanori.
Predicting culture results for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test and acid-fast bacilli microscopy.
Chest, 118 (2000), pp. 28-32
[4.]
J. Sambrook, D.W. Russell, J. Sambrook.
3rd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, (2001),
[5.]
WHO/TB/2003.320 - WHO/CDS/CSR/RMD/2003.3. Guidelines for surveillance of drug resistance in tuberculosis. 2nd ed. Edited by: Aziz MA, Laszlo A, Raviglione M, Rieder H, Espinal M, Wright A. World Health Organization. Geneva: 2003.
[6.]
B. Böddinghaus, T. Rogall, T. Florhr, H. Blocker, E.C. Bottger.
Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNA.
J Clin Microbiol, 28 (1990), pp. 1751-1759
[7.]
T. Rogall, T. Flohr, E.C. Bottger.
Differentiation of Mycobacterium species by direct sequencing of amplified DNA.
J Gen Microb, 136 (1990), pp. 1915-1920
[8.]
E. Pizzichini, M.M.M. Pizzichini, A. Efhtimiadis, F.E. Hargreave, J. Dolovich.
Measurement of inflammatory indices in induced sputum: effects of selection of sputum to minimize salivary contamination.
Eur Respir J, 9 (1996), pp. 1174-1180
[9.]
G.R. Lee, T.C. Bithel, J. Foerster, J.W. Athens, J.N. Lukens.
Hematologia Clínica de Wintrobe.
Ed. Manole, (1998),
[10.]
G.F. Araj, R.S. Talhouk, L.Y. Itani, W. Jaber, G.W. Jamaleddine.
Comparative performance of PCR-based assay versus microscopy and culture for direct detection of M. tuberculosis in clinical specimens in Lebanon.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis., 4 (2000), pp. 877-881
[11.]
J.S. Skerrett.
Diagnostic testing for community-acquired pneumonia.
Clin Chest Med, 20 (1999), pp. 531-548
[12.]
C. Chuard, D. Fracheboud, C. Regamey.
Effect of sputum induction by hypertonic saline on specimen quality.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 39 (2001), pp. 211-214
[13.]
L.L. Flores, M. Pai, J.R. Colfors, L.W. Riley.
In-house nucleic acid amplification tests for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum species: meta-analysis and meta-regression.
BMC Microbiol, 5 (2005), pp. 55
[14.]
O.L. Sarmiento, K.A. Weigle, J. Alexander, D.J. Weber, W.C. Miller.
Assessment by meta-analyses of PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis.
J Clin Microbiol, 41 (2003), pp. 3233-3240
[15.]
N.C.S. Assis, M.L. Lopes, N.C. Cardoso, M.M. Costa, C.O. Souza, K.V.B. Lima.
Diagnóstico molecular da tuberculose pulmonar.
J Bras Patol Med Lab, 43 (2007), pp. 1-7
[16.]
R.M.C. Santos, M.M. Ogusku, J.M. Miranda, M.C. Dos Santos, J.I. Salem.
Avaliação da reação em cadeia da polimerase no diagnóstico da tuberculose pulmonar em pacientes indígenas e não indígenas.
J Bras Pneumol, 32 (2006), pp. 234-240
[17.]
D.M. Lima, V.R. Bollela, B.J.T. Jácomo, R. Martinez, B.A.L. Fonseca.
Identification of Mycobacterium species in contaminated cultures by polimerase chain reaction.
Chest, 127 (2005), pp. 1283-1288
[18.]
L. Kivihya-Ndugga, M. Van Cleeff, E. Juma, et al.
Comparison of PCR with the routine procedure for diagnosis of tuberculosis on a population with high prevalence of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus.
J Clin Microbiol, 42 (2004), pp. 1012-1015
[19.]
S.V. Wijengaert, A. Dediste, M. Gerard, O. Vandenberg, G. Zissis.
Critical nucleic acid amplification techniques to test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory tract samples.
J Clin Microbiol, 42 (2004), pp. 837-838
[20.]
E. Tortoli.
Impact of genotypic studies on Mycobacterial taxonomy: the new Mycobacteria of the 1990s.
Clin Microbiol Rev, 16 (2003), pp. 319-354
[21.]
A. Waléria-Aleixo, E.G. Kroon, M.A.S. Campos, M.E. Marguti-Pinto, C.A. Bonjardim, P.C. Ferreira.
Heteroduplex Mobility Assay for Rapid, Sensitive and Specific Detection of Mycobacteria.
Diag Microbiol Infect Dis, 36 (2000), pp. 225-235
[22.]
Bazzo ML. Método de identificação e caracterização de micobactérias para uso em diagnóstico de rotina nos laboratórios de saúde e determinação da resistência. PhD Thesis. Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2006.
[23.]
T.L. Wu, J.H. Chia, A.J. Kuo, L.H. Su, T.S. Wu, H.S. Lai.
Rapid identification of Mycobacteria from smear positive sputum samples by Nested PCR-Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.
J Clin Microbiol, 46 (2008), pp. 3591-3594
Copyright © 2010. Elsevier Editora Ltda.. All rights reserved
Download PDF
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools