Journal Information
Vol. 16. Issue 6.
Pages 599-600 (November - December 2012)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 16. Issue 6.
Pages 599-600 (November - December 2012)
Letter to the editor
Open Access
Incidence and outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia (our experience)
Visits
3260
Ljiljana Gvozdenović, Jovanka Kolarović, Mirka Šarkanović-Lukić
Clinical Center Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
Mira Popović, Svetlana Trivić
Corresponding author
svetlana.trivic@dh.uns.ac.rs

Corresponding author at: Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Table 1. Resistance of isolated microorganisms to the tested antimicrobial drugs.
Full Text
Dear Editor,

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most significant nosocomial infection in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who have been on mechanical ventilation (MV) for over 48hours, and is related to higher morbidity and mortality of these patients (24% to 72%).1,2 During a prospective study, 813 patients were hospitalized in the ICU of the Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Republic of Serbia. All patients were on MV for over 72hours. 40% of our patients were on MV for five to ten days. Dostanic et al.3 have obtained similar results. The mean duration of MV was 222.3hours. There were both male and female patients, and their mean age was 55 years. VAP was suspected in 115 patients. Microorganisms were isolated and identified in 82 patients. Of the total number of analyzed patients with suspected VAP, 29% had no bacteria, 28% had only one isolated bacteria, while the remaining 43% of patients had polymicrobial isolates.

Testing bacterial sensitivity to antimicrobial drugs was performed using a standard disc diffusion method by Kirby-Bauer, according to the guidelines of the European Committee. All isolated microorganisms showed over 50% resistance for amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, ampicillin, cefalexin, ceftriaxone, and tigecyclin (Table 1).

Table 1.

Resistance of isolated microorganisms to the tested antimicrobial drugs.

Antimicrobial drugs  Isolated microorganisms
  Pseudomonas aeruginosaAcinetobacter spp.Klebsiella pneumoniaeStenotrophomonas maltophiliaEnterobacter spp.
  Sa  Rb 
Amikacin  63  47  40  60  59  41  91  80  20 
Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid  100  96  92  100  100 
Ampicillin  100  100  100  100  100 
Cefalexin  100  94  100  100  100 
Cefepime  59  41  100  14  86  36  64  40  60 
Ceftazidime  78  22  100  14  86  55  45  50  50 
Ceftriaxone  13  87  16  84  100  40  60 
Ciprofloxacin  53  47  12  88  43  57  82  18  80  20 
Gentamycin  50  50  10  90  59  41  49  51  70  30 
Imipenem  59  41  96  100  100  100 
Meropenem  75  25  44  56  100  100  100 
Tazocin (piperacillin+ tazobactam)  78  22  96  78  22  45  55  100 
Tigecycline  100  96  100  100  100 
Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole  97  100  19  81  73  27  80  20 
a

sensitive strains shown as percentage.

b

resistant strains shown as percentage.

Acinetobacter spp. was the most prevalent bacteria (65%) in respiratory secretion of patients on MV, and it presented multidrug-resistance in over 90% of cases. Results from this research showed identification of polymicrobial isolates in 43% of cases; 23% of cases presented two bacteria, 16% presented three bacteria, 3% presented four bacteria, and 1% presented five bacteria. Combes et al.,4 isolated two bacteria in 70% of cases; however, they found 16.7% of tribacterial cases, similarly to our findings.

In our research, Klebsiella pneumoniae was resistant to third-generation cephalosporins in over 80% of cases, while in a study from Poland the resistance rate ranged from 56% to 73%.5

The mortality rate was 68%, which is in agreement with the literature.1,2 Based on the data obtained, we can conclude that the incidence of VAP at the ICU was high.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare to have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia.

References
[1]
W.G. Melsen, M.M. Rovers, M. Koeman, M.J. Bonten.
Estimating the attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia from randomized prevention studies.
Crit Care Med, 39 (2011), pp. 2736-2742
[2]
A.C. Morris, A.W. Hay, D.G. Swann, et al.
Reducing ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care: impact of implementing a care bundle.
Crit Care Med, 39 (2011), pp. 2218-2224
[3]
M. Dostanić, M. Stošić, B. Milaković, S. Jovanović.
Analiza endotrahealnog aspirata kod bolesnika na mehanickoj ventilaciji.
Anestezija i intenzivna terapija, 29 (2006), pp. 107-116
[4]
A. Combes, C. Figliolini, J.L. Trouillet, et al.
Incidence and outcome of polymicrobial ventilator associated pneumonia.
Chest, 121 (2002), pp. 1618-1623
[5]
S.J. Palazzo, T. Simpson, L. Schnapp.
Biomarkers for ventilator-associated pneumonia: review of the literature.
Heart Lung, 40 (2011), pp. 293-298
Copyright © 2012. Elsevier Editora Ltda.. All rights reserved
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools