Suggestions
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
715
Full text access

SEMIQUANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF CONCURRENT CLEANING IN AN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT USING FLUORESCENCE: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL

Visits
593
Mateus Cavalcante Melo
Corresponding author
mateus.melo.med@gmail.com

Corresponding author:
, Vitor Castilho Chain, Pedro Basaglia Rodrigues, Nicole Martins Stella, Ana Luiza Andrade Fernandes, Lara Camilo Fernandes, Aline De Mattos Silva, Dinardo Rocha Carneiro, Gustavo de Miranda Martins, Leandro César Mendes
Universidade São Francisco, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 30. Issue S1

XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025

More info
Introduction

Healthcare-associated infections represent a persistent challenge in hospital settings, especially in intensive care units (ICUs), where patients are more susceptible to pathogens. Concurrent cleaning — performed with the patient present — is an essential infection control measure, but its effectiveness can be compromised by technical failures and low adherence to protocols.

Objective

To evaluate, using a fluorescent marker, the effectiveness of concurrent cleaning performed in ICU beds.

Methods

This is an observational, cross-sectional, descriptive, and semiquantitative study, developed in the ICUs of a tertiary hospital. Sixty occupied beds were evaluated (43 standard, 11 isolation, and 6 under contact precautions). Specific surfaces were marked with a 20% fluorescein-based suspension and inspected with ultraviolet light after cleaning. Points were classified according to the responsibility of the nursing staff or the cleaning team. High-touch points and areas difficult to clean were selected. “Not removed” was considered both visibly present marker and partially removed marker. Cleaning effectiveness rates between different bed types and responsible teams were analyzed statistically using the Clopper-Pearson method, followed by mixed-effects binomial regression.

Results

In standard beds, nursing showed 50.0% effectiveness in removing marked points (100/200; 95% CI: 42.9–57.1) and the cleaning team, 41.1% (97/236; 95% CI: 34.8–47.7), p = 0.067. In isolation beds, nursing had 46.2% (30/65; 95% CI: 33.7–59.0) and cleaning 40.5% (32/79; 95% CI: 29.6–52.1), with no significant difference (p = 0.505). In beds under contact precautions, lower overall effectiveness in marker removal was observed: 21.0% for nursing (8/38; 95% CI: 9.6–37.3) and 39.3% for cleaning (11/28; 95% CI: 21.5–59.4), p = 0.168.

Conclusion

Concurrent cleaning showed unsatisfactory effectiveness, especially in beds under contact precautions. Although statistical significance was not reached, a trend toward better nursing performance in standard beds was observed. The data reinforce the need for continuous training of teams, strengthening oversight, and adopting objective methods, such as fluorescence and statistical analysis with exact intervals, to qualify surveillance of hospital cleaning.

Keywords:
Intensive Care Units
Quality of Healthcare Assistance
Infection Control
PDF
Full text is only available in PDF
Download PDF
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools