Suggestions
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
Cite
Cite
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
225
Full text access

PROFILE OF DIAGNOSIS AND VACCINATION AGAINST MPOX AMONG MSM, TRAVESTIS, AND TRANS WOMEN IN BRAZIL: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL ONLINE SURVEY

Visits
789
Thiago Silva Torres
Corresponding author
ttorres79@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Mayara Secco Torres da Silva, Paula Mendes Luz, Carolina Coutinho, Brenda Hoagland, Emilia Moreira Jalil, Cristina Pimenta, Marcos Benedetti, Sandra Wagner Cardoso, Valdilea Gonçalves Veloso, Beatriz Grinsztejn
Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 30. Issue S1

XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025

More info
Introduction

Mpox became a global emergency in 2022, disproportionately affecting sexual and gender minorities (SGM), especially men who have sex with men (MSM). This work aims to identify the profile of people who reported prior diagnosis or vaccination against mpox in Brazil.

Methods

Cross-sectional online survey with MSM and travestis/trans women (TMW) aged ≥ 18 in Brazil, recruited via social networks (Aug–Dec/2024). We collected sociodemographic and behavioral data, history of mpox and vaccination. We compared characteristics between those reporting mpox diagnosis (yes/no) and vaccination (yes/no).

Results

Among 7,043 participants (MSM: 99%; 18% aged 18–30; 24% with high school or less), 2.2% (n = 152) reported prior mpox diagnosis and 5.1% (n = 358) reported vaccination (1 dose: 46.1%; 2 doses: 47.8%; ≥ 2 doses: 6.1%). Among those diagnosed, 7.9% required hospitalization, 2.4% had no clinical follow-up, 7.9% had sex during infection, and 90.8% reported adherence to isolation. Compared with those not diagnosed, those with mpox diagnosis more often had higher education (84% vs 76%; p = 0.016), self-identified as homosexual (88% vs 81%; p = 0.045), and lived in capitals (88% vs 77%; p = 0.002). They also more frequently reported living with HIV (51% vs 26%; p < 0.001), current PrEP use (66% vs 29%; p < 0.001), ≥ 5 sexual partners in the last six months (71% vs 39%; p < 0.001), chemsex (57% vs 29%; p < 0.001), and recent STI diagnosis (41% vs 14%; p < 0.001). Among vaccinated individuals versus unvaccinated, there were higher proportions aged ≥ 30 (86% vs 82%; p = 0.05), self-identified as White (63% vs 56%; p < 0.001), living with HIV (45% vs 25%; p < 0.001), and current PrEP use (50% vs 29%; p < 0.001). They also more frequently reported ≥ 5 partners in the last six months (51% vs 39%; p < 0.001), chemsex (41% vs 30%; p < 0.001), and recent STI (20% vs 15%; p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Despite mpox’s impact among SGM, vaccination remains low and concentrated in subgroups with higher schooling. Expanding vaccine coverage and improving clinical care are essential, with strategies focused on those at highest risk to reduce vulnerabilities and strengthen Brazil’s mpox response.

Keywords:
Mpox
Vaccine
HIV
Pre-exposure prophylaxis
PDF
Full text is only available in PDF
Download PDF
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools