Suggestions
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
74
Full text access

OVERVIEW OF BRAZILIAN HOSPITALS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP PROGRAMS

Visits
141
Mariana Corturato Pontela,b,c,
Corresponding author
mariana.corturato@uel.br

Corresponding author:
, Marcelo Carneiroa,b,c, Magda Machado de Miranda Costaa,b,c, Mara Rubia Santos Gonçalvesa,b,c, Rochele Mosmann Menezesa,b,c, Caroline Alegransia,b,c, Gabson Araujo Aragoneza,b,c, Ingre Paza,b,c, Lucas Augusto Hochscheidta,b,c, Bruna Eduarda Hochscheidta,b,c, Eliane Carlosso Krummenauera,b,c, Adalia Pinheiro Loureiroa,b,c, Marcia Regina Eches Peruginia,b,c
a Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa), Brazil
b Programa de Pós-Graduação em Promoção da Saúde, Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Cruz do Sul, RS, Brazil
c Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 30. Issue S1

XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025

More info
Introduction/Objective

Microbial resistance represents a growing threat to public health, intensified by the use of antimicrobials. Adherence to antimicrobial management programs is still limited in many Brazilian hospitals. The objective was to compare hospitals that implemented such programs with those that have not yet adopted this strategy.

Methods

A cross-sectional, retrospective, and multicenter study was conducted in Brazilian hospitals with adult intensive care units, included by non-probabilistic and convenience sampling. Data collection was carried out through a self-administered electronic questionnaire composed of 94 items (2024–2025). Institutional characteristics and compliance with the six essential components of antimicrobial management programs were evaluated. The units were grouped according to hospital profile and categorized into four levels of implementation.

Results

A total of 1,453 hospitals from all federative units participated, of which 766 (52.7%) reported having the antimicrobial management program implemented. The hospital infection control committee was present in 99.8% and 97.8% of hospitals with and without the program, respectively. Regarding laboratory/microbiological capacity, the frequency of outsourced laboratories did not vary, remaining around 30.0%. Most programs were implemented from 2020 onwards, with higher frequency in 2024 (28.5%). Among the difficulties reported for program execution were high staff turnover, disorganization of processes, and low team engagement. In hospitals without the program, the main obstacles mentioned were the absence of qualified professionals, limited institutional support, and insufficient resources. Despite this, 100% of the institutions stated that they develop at least one action aimed at the use of antimicrobials.

Conclusion

Hospitals with an antimicrobial management program implemented showed greater maturity in clinical governance. On the other hand, hospitals without the program showed operational and structural limitations that weaken the overall implementation of measures. The findings reinforce the need for coordinated national strategies and institutional technical support to expand adherence and strengthen the capacity of Brazilian health services in addressing microbial resistance and all related impacts.

Keywords:
Antimicrobial Management
Antimicrobials
Resistance
Intensive Care Unit
Brazil
Full text is only available in PDF
Download PDF
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools