Suggestions
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
56
Full text access

IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP PROGRAMS IN LATIN AMERICAN HOSPITALS: LESSONS FROM THE PRE-INTERVENTION PHASE

Visits
165
Marcelo Carneiroa,
Corresponding author
marceloc@unisc.br

Corresponding author:
, Javier Araujob, Alejandra Macchic, Eugenia Di Líberod, Jose Pablo Diaz Madrize, Anahí Dreserf, Paola Lichtenbergerg, Christian Pallaresh, Gina Makii, John E. McKinnoni, Odaliz Abreu-Lanfrancoi, William Campillo Terrazasi, Diana Cardenas Maldonadoi
a Programa de Pós-Graduação Promoção da Saúde, Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Cruz do Sul, RS, Brazil
b Hospital Cuenca Alta Nestor Kirchner, Buenos Aires, Argentina
c Sanatorio Las Lomas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
d Hospital Evita de Lanús, Buenos Aires, Argentina
e Clínica Bíblica, San Jospe, Costa Rica
f Instituto Saúde Pública, Brazil
g Universidade de Miami, Miami, USA
h Imbanaco Medical Center, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
i Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA
Ver más
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 30. Issue S1

XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025

More info
Introduction

Inappropriate antimicrobial use represents one of the main drivers of the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. This study aims to assess the level of implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in Latin American hospitals and to identify weaknesses that may support the development of future strategies.

Methods

This was a prospective, multicenter study (pre-intervention phase) including a non-probabilistic sample of 22 hospitals from 10 Latin American countries. Data were collected from March to May 2025 through a validated self-assessment instrument for antimicrobial stewardship programs. Scores ranged from 0 to 100 and were grouped by percentiles.

Results

Among participating hospitals, 91% belonged to the public health network. Of the 127 professionals involved, 76% were women. Physicians accounted for 35%, while clinical pharmacists and microbiologists each represented 20%. The overall score was 55.4 (50th percentile). The domain “strategies to optimize antimicrobial prescribing” achieved the highest score in the baseline assessment, likely reflecting the activity of hospital infection control committees. Conversely, the “education” domain had the lowest score, underscoring the need for ongoing training of physicians, patients, and family members — a critical point identified in this analysis. Among the evaluated components, “executive leadership support,” “validated treatment protocols,” and “antimicrobial use process indicators” also received low scores, limiting program consolidation since many actions depend on formal endorsement from hospital administration. The absence of therapeutic protocols tailored to the institutional microbiological profile poses clinical risks, increases costs, and contributes to microbial resistance.

Conclusion

Antimicrobial stewardship programs in Latin America remain, for the most part, only partially implemented. Phases II and III of this study will provide indicators of the effectiveness of structured, periodic online mentoring for stewardship professionals in participating hospitals by re-assessing scores using the same validated self-assessment tool at the end of the study in August 2026.

Keywords:
Resistance
Antimicrobials
Antimicrobial stewardship
Latin America
Brazil
Full text is only available in PDF
Download PDF
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools