XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
More infoAntimicrobial resistance is a public health problem with global impact.
ObjectiveTo implement a bundle of measures for monitoring and preventing the dissemination of multidrug-resistant bacteria in two Brazilian public hospitals and to monitor outcomes during the pre-intervention (Jun/23–Feb/24) and post-intervention (Mar/24–Nov/24) periods.
MethodsHospital A included an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with 20 beds and a hematology unit (20 beds). Hospital B included an Emergency ICU (10 beds) and a clinical ward (39 beds). The bundle included surveillance of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) through admission and weekly rectal swabs; monitoring of hand hygiene adherence; contact precautions; environmental cleaning and disinfection; technical visits by specialists; an educational program via a web platform; and biweekly monitoring of indicators. All data were recorded in specific RedCap forms.
ResultsA total of 3,130 patients were included, with 4,021 care records. Admission rectal swabs were collected in 70% (2,805) of all records, with positivity rates of 2.6% for CR-AB, 9.6% for CR-KP, and 2.2% for simultaneous CR-KP and CR-AB. The incidence density of CR-KP and CR-AB was 8.7 and 3.7 per 1,000 patient-days in the pre-intervention period, and 12.98 and 3.65 per 1,000 patient-days in the post-intervention period, respectively. Between periods, hand hygiene adherence improved from 50% (3,324/6,661) to 58% (4,900/8,485), as did compliance with surface cleaning and disinfection from 52.5% (1,889/3,483) to 64.7% (2,420/3,742). Regarding contact precautions, improvements were observed in stethoscope disinfection between patients (37.6% [71/189] to 81.2% [211/260]), appropriate use of personal protective equipment (45.8% [447/977] to 65.1% [545/837]), and glove change between contaminated and clean sites (35% [82/234] to 65.1% [545/837]).
DiscussionThere was improvement in antimicrobial resistance surveillance and gradual adherence to the prevention bundle throughout the study. However, a reduction in the incidence of new cases was not observed, likely due to unmeasured limitations such as patient-to-staff ratio, colonization pressure, irregular supply of preventive materials, and gaps in professional training.



