Suggestions
Journal Information
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
Vol. 30. Issue S1.
XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025
(March 2026)
36
Full text access

COMPARATIVE IN VITRO PERFORMANCE OF COMBINED ANTIBIOTIC ELUTION IN DIFFERENT CERAMIC BONE SUBSTITUTES AND CEMENT USING SENSITIVE AND MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT PATHOGENS

Visits
116
Isabelle Caroline Frois Brasil Tannus
Corresponding author
isabelle.brasil@unifesp.br

Corresponding author:
, Mariana Neri Lucas Kurihara, Ingrid Marcelino Santos, Stefânia Bazanelli Prebianchi, Laura Batista Campos, Mayara Muniz de Andrade Silva, Rafael Brull Tuma, Thomas Stranvinskas Durigon, Carlos Augusto Finelli, Fernando Baldy Dos Reis, Danielle Borges Germano, Steffany Bernardo Oliveira, Mauro José Costa Salles
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 30. Issue S1

XXIV Brazilian Congress of Infectious Diseases 2025

More info
Objective

To investigate the efficacy of biomaterials with antibacterial properties in inhibiting the growth of microorganisms commonly associated with infections in orthopedic implants.

Methods

Antibiotics released from nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite with calcium sulfate (HCS), calcium sulfate (CaSO₄), and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) beads were tested against ATCC strains (ATCC29213, ATCC12228, ATCC6919, ATCC47085) and clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA), and Cutibacterium acnes (CA), including multidrug-resistant and susceptible strains. Carriers were loaded with gentamicin (G), vancomycin (V), or gentamicin plus vancomycin (G+V). Inhibition zone (ZOI) assays determined antibiotic release and potency over 1 to 15 days (D1–D15). The Biofilm-Oriented Antiseptic Test (BOAT) was used to assess biofilm suppression after 24-hour exposure to antibiotic-loaded beads.

Results

Bioceramics (CaSO₄ and HCS) showed greater potency during early phases (D1–D3) (p < 0.05) against Staphylococcus spp., especially for G+V combinations. Between D1–D5, the ZOI differences between bioceramics and PMMA were no longer statistically significant, suggesting initial efficacy differences diminish over time. At later stages (D5–D15), PMMA exhibited larger ZOIs compared to bioceramics (p < 0.05) for most strains. CaSO₄ loaded with V maintained a larger ZOI up to D7 versus PMMA for MRSA (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found between CaSO₄ and HCS for SA. G+V elution in both bioceramics and PMMA significantly improved ZOIs for SE and CA strains (p < 0.05). There were no significant ZOI differences between carriers for PSA strains; by D5, no inhibition was observed for PSA with any material. For CA, bioceramics tended to yield larger ZOIs. BOAT demonstrated optical density inhibition for all strains except MRSA exposed to G alone and CA strains.

Conclusion

Both bioceramics and PMMA beads acted as effective carriers; however, greater antimicrobial elution and biofilm eradication during early phases (D1–D5) were observed with bioceramics, while PMMA showed superior activity at later stages (D5–D15).

Keywords:
Biofilm
Osteomyelitis
Antimicrobial
Local treatment
Biomaterials
Full text is only available in PDF
Download PDF
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools