Journal Information
Vol. 15. Issue 4.
Pages 328-331 (July - August 2011)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 15. Issue 4.
Pages 328-331 (July - August 2011)
Original
Open Access
Risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection: a prospective multicenter study in Brazilian intensive care units
Visits
2622
Daniela Bicudo1,*, Ruth Batista2, Guilherme Henrique Furtado3, Angela Sola1, Eduardo Alexandrino Servolo de Medeiros4
1 Nurse, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), SP, Brazil
2 Nurse, Hospital São Paulo, UNIFESP, SP, Brazil
3 Post-doctorate in Health Sciences, Infectology, Hospital São Paulo, UNIFESP, SP, Brazil
4 Infectious Diseases Department, UNIFESP, SP, Brazil
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Introduction

Central venous catheters (CVC) are devices of great importance in health care. The advantages gained from the use of catheters outweigh the complications that might result from their use, among which bloodstream infections (BSI). In spite of its importance, few national studies have addressed this issue.

Objective

The aim this study was to determine the incidence of BSI in patients with CVC, hospitalized in ICU, as well as the variables associated with this complication.

Methods

Multicentric cohort study carried out at ICUs of three hospitals at Universidade Federal de São Paulo complex.

Results

A total of 118 cases of BSI in 11.546 catheters day were observed: 10.22 BSI per 1,000 catheters day. On average, BSI was associated to seven additional days of hospital stay in our study (p<0.001), with a significant difference between types of catheters. Concerning the place of insertion, there was no statistical difference in BSI rates.

Conclusion

We concluded that a patient who uses a catheter for longer than 13 days presents a progressive risk for infection of approximately three times higher in relation to a patient who uses the catheter for less than 13 days (p<0.001). The median duration of catheter use was 14 days among patients with BSI and 9 days in patients without infection (p<0.001). There was higher prevalence of Gram-negative infections. The risk factors for BSI were utilization of multiple-lumen catheters, duration of catheterization and ICU length of stay.

Keywords:
intensive care units
catheter-related infections
catheterization, BSI
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1.]
D.K. Warren, J.E. Zack, J.L. Mayfield, et al.
The effect of an education program on the incidence of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection in a medical ICU.
Chest, 126 (2004), pp. 1612-1618
[2.]
N.P. O’Grady, M. Alexander, E.P. Dellinger, et al.
Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
MMWR Recomm Resp, 51 (2002), pp. 1-29
[3.]
E.W. Moretti, C.L. Ofstead, R.M. Kristy, et al.
Impact of central venous catheter type and methods on catheter-related colonization an bacteremia.
J Hosp Infection, 61 (2005), pp. 139-145
[4.]
W.E. Trick, J. Miranda, A.T. Evans, et al.
Prospective cohort study of central venous catheters among internal medicine ward patients.
Am J Infect Control, 34 (2006), pp. 636-641
[5.]
V.D. Rosenthal, D.G. Maki, R. Salomão, et al.
International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium. Device-associated nosocomial infections in 55 intensive care units of 8 developing countries.
Ann Intern Med, 145 (2006), pp. 582-591
[6.]
V.D. Rosenthal, D.G. Maki, A. Mehta, et al.
The International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC): Goals and objectives, description of surveillance methods, and operational activities.
Am J Control, 36 (2008), pp. 627-637
[7.]
E. Tacconelli, G. Smith, K. Hieke, et al.
Epidemiology, medical outcomes and costs of catheter-related bloodstream infections in intensive care units of four European countries: literatureand registry-based estimates.
J Hosp Infect, 72 (2009), pp. 97-103
[8.]
P. Eggimann, D. Pittet.
Infection control in the ICU.
Chest, 120 (2001), pp. 2059-2093
[9.]
P. Mitt, V. Adamson, K. Loivukene, et al.
Epidemiology of nosocomial bloodstream infections in Estonia.
J Hosp Infect, 71 (2009), pp. 365-370
[10.]
A. Templeton, M. Schlegel, F. Fleisch, et al.
Multilumen central venous catheters increase risk for catheter-related bloodstream infection: prospective surveillance study.
Infection, 36 (2008), pp. 322-327
[11.]
L. Lorente, C. Henry, M.M. Martin, A. Jimenez, et al.
Central venous catheter related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters.
Crit Care, 9 (2005), pp. R631-R635
[12.]
T.I. Van der Kooi, A.S. Boer, J. Mannien, et al.
Incidence and risk factors of device-associated infections and associated mortality at the intensive care in the Dutch surveillance system.
Intensive Care Med, 33 (2007), pp. 271-278
[13.]
M.L. Abramczyk, W.B. Carvalho, E.S. Carvalho, et al.
Nosocomial infection in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing country.
Braz J Infect Dis, 7 (2003), pp. 375-380
Copyright © 2011. Elsevier Editora Ltda.. All rights reserved
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Article options
Tools