Journal Information
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
47
Brief communication
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2018.12.004
Open Access
Available online 23 March 2019
Early use of polymyxin B reduces the mortality of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection
Visits
47
Qiqiang Lianga, Man Huanga,
Corresponding author
huangman@zju.edu.cn

Corresponding author.
, Zhijiang Xub
a Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, General Intensive Care Unit, Zhejiang, China
b Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Clinical Laboratory, Zhejiang, China
This item has received
47
Visits

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (2)
Tables (1)
Table 1. Characteristics of patients with bacteremia due to CRKP and variables associated with administration timing of polymyxin B between early and delayed administration.
Abstract

Polymyxin B is one of the last resort option for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bloodstream infection in China. Therefore, the timing of administration of polymyxin is frequently delayed. We collected 40 cases of CRKP bloodstream infections (BSIs) treated with combinations based on polymyxin B over 30 months. The primary outcome, 30-day mortality rate, was 52.5% (21/40). Early administration of polymyxin B is meant to administer the drug within 48h of diagnosing bacteremia. Delayed administration was considered when polymyxin B was administered after 48h of bacteremia onset. Polymyxin B duration and total dosages were similar in the two groups (11.57 days versus 11.76 days, p=0.919; 1306.52mg versus 1247.06mg, p=0.711). Compared with delayed administration, early use of polymyxin B-based combination therapy had a significant increase in the rate of bacterial clearance (65.22% versus 29.41%, p=0.025; OR=0.533) and decreased 30-day mortality (39.13% versus 70.59%, p=0.045; OR=0.461) and overall mortality (43.48% versus 82.35%, p=0.022; OR=0.321).

Keywords:
carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection
Polymyxin B-based combination therapy
Drug use timing
Full Text
Introduction

The increasing prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is a healthcare crisis in China. Bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by CRKP is a more serious situation due to ineffective antibacterials and high mortality.1 Therapeutic options against these infections are limited; “second line” agents include colistin, tigecycline, aminoglycosides, and carbapenems.2 The best available treatment against CRKP infections is still under study owing to different chemoresistance mechanisms and limited effectiveness. Rather than monotherapy, clinicians are increasingly resorting to combination therapies, such as dual carbapenems, carbapenems combined with polymyxin B or tigecycline.3–5 However, clinical outcomes are not confirmed in the absence of evidence-based trials.

Regarded as one of the last resorts, polymyxin B has been used alternatively in China, especially following the surge of CRKP only susceptible to colistin. Thus, researchers are paying more attention to polymyxin B options as monotherapy or combination therapy, medication doses, and adverse effects.2 Combination therapy is probably better than monotherapy for serious CRKP bacteremia, but the timing clinicians should implement such therapy is still unclear.2,5,6 Our retrospective observational study aimed to estimate the impact of early initiation of polymyxin B on the outcome of patients with CRKP BSI.

MethodsSetting

A 1200-bed academic tertiary care hospital with 40 intensive care beds, in Hangzhou, China. Records from patients with positive blood culture for CRKP were retrieved from October 1st 2015 to March 31st 2018. Patients who received polymyxin B treatment were selected from the hospital database and information on basic characteristics, laboratory results, therapeutic options, and outcomes was abstracted. The clinical parameters, originating from the hospital database without subjective judgments, were nearly objective, which avoided recall bias and selection bias. The key outcome was 30-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included bacterial clearance rate and total mortality. The writing process for this report followed STROBE recommendations.

Exclusion criteria included the following: (a) age less than 18 or older than 85 years; (b) pregnancy or breast-feeding women; (c) end-stage renal disease; terminal stages of solid tumor or hematological malignancies; terminal pulmonary diseases; or severe autoimmune disease; (d) other refractory microbial infections in the period of BSIs, including carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and other Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infections; or invasive fungal disease; (e) polymyxin B treatments for less than three days for any reason; (f) intracranial CRKP infections; and (g) Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score over 30.

Definition

Early administration of polymyxin B was considered when the drug was administered within 48h of bacteremia onset; the remaining patients were grouped as delayed administration.5 Bacterial clearance was defined as two negative blood cultures, improved infection symptoms after treatment, and no rebound in one week thereafter All patients received polymyxin B at dosages of 1.5–2.5mg/kg daily. Adult patients received half of the dosage every 12h, with adjusted dosages in patients with renal insufficiency. The diagnostic criteria for acute renal injury (AKI) followed the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. Invasive procedures included catheterizations of deep veins or arteries for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PICCO), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Immunodeficiency was determined mainly by laboratory indicators, history of chemotherapy and long-term use of either glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants. Severe thrombocytopenia meant a blood platelet count less than 20×109/L. The severity rating of the patient's acute condition at admission was based on APACHE II scores, the Charlson comorbidity indexes, the SOFA scores, and the Pitt bacteremia scores. Infectious sources were categorized as definite infection or colonization in other sites preceding BSI onset; otherwise the BSI was deemed primary. Septic shock definition followed sepsis 3.0.7

Bacterial detection

Drug susceptibility test was carried out with the broth microdilution method by a laboratory physician with analysis instruments (VITEK2 AST-GN16 French). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination and interpretation were determined on a VITEK2 system, based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)8 recommendations. Carbapenem resistance meant imipenem and meropenem MIC4mg/L. It is noteworthy that resistance to tigecycline and colistin meant MIC>2mg/L, respectively, referring to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST, version 8.0, 2018).9

Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed using the statistical software package SPSS, version 22 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, USA). Categorical variables in the two groups were compared with the Pearson χ2 or Fisher's exact test if cells had an expected frequency of 5 or fewer, and continuous variables with t-test for independent samples. 30-Day survival from bacteremia onset was plotted as Kaplan–Meier curves. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to evaluate the strength of association. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 69 patients who had CRKP bacteremia and received polymyxin B between Oct 1, 2015, and Mar 31, 2018 were retrieved. Forty cases were ultimately analyzed, and 29 cases were excluded. Refractory mixed infections occurred in 15 cases, including seven CRAB and four CRPA infections, three cases with MRSA, three cases with serious intracranial CRKP infections, and one case of invasive aspergillosis. More details can be seen in the flow chart (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Flow chart of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae treated with polymyxin B.

(0.28MB).

Table 1 reports the characteristics of patients with bacteremia due to CRKP and the variables associated with the timing of polymyxin B between early and delayed administration. The early use and delayed use groups had similar characteristics and great homogeneity. As a trauma center, complicated multiple injuries, as common primary diseases leading to ICU admission, accounted for 37.5%, the same as infectious diseases in our study. Age, sex and source of infection were similar in the two groups, and types of primary diseases were not significantly different. Broncho-pulmonary infection was considered the source of bacteremia in 16 patients and the gastrointestinal tract in five cases. Primary bloodstream infections, without clearly CRKP infectious or colonized sites, accounted for a large proportion (42.5%).

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with bacteremia due to CRKP and variables associated with administration timing of polymyxin B between early and delayed administration.

  Early administration (n=23)  Delayed administration (n=17)  p-Value (OR and 95% CI) 
Basic information
Age  61.57  61.35  0.962 
M/F  21/2  13/4  0.374 
Primary disease
Multiple injuries  0.68 
Infections  10  0.364 
Cerebrovascular diseases 
Acute abdomen  0.294 
Source of infection
Primary  0.616 
Broncho-Pulmonary  11  0.24 
Gastrointestinal tract  0.397 
Other 
Clinical characteristics
APACHEII scores  18.83  22.06  0.103 
SOFA scores  15.43  14.47  0.293 
Charlson comorbidity index  2.87  2.53  0.541 
Pitt bacteremia score  4.17  3.41  0.679 
White blood cell count (109/L)  19.95  17.9  0.572 
PLT (109/L)  79.18  87.47  0.769 
CRP (mg/L)  189.53  166.86  0.333 
PCT (μg/L)  15.46  7.23  0.208 
Septic shock  14  10  0.896 
Severe thrombocytopenia  10  0.601 
Hyperbilirubinemia  0.616 
Acute kidney injury  0.433 
Recent operation History  13  10  0.884 
Invasive procedures  13  11  0.601 
Tracheotomy  11  11  0.289 
Immunosuppression  11  0.428 
Antimicrobial susceptibility test
Meropenem MIC4 (μg/mL)  23  17  1.000 
Imipenem MIC4 (μg/mL)  23  17  1.000 
Tigecycline MIC>2 (μg/mL)  0.816 
Colistin MIC>2 (μg/mL) 
Therapeutic regimen (death/all)
Combination with tigecycline  3/7 (42.86%)  4/5 (80%)  0.944 
Combination with carbapenems  6/15 (40%)  6/10 (60%)  0.428 
Combination with amikacin  0/1 (0%)  2/2 (100%) 
Polymyxin B duration (days)  11.57  11.76  0.919 
Total polymyxin B dosage (mg)  1306.52  1247.06  0.771 
Therapeutic effect
Bacterial clearance rate  15(65.22%)  5(29.41%)  0.025 (OR=0.533; CI:0.295–0.965) 
Mortality in 30 days  9 (39.13%)  12 (70.59%)  0.045 (OR=0.461; CI:0.199–0.989) 
Total mortality  10 (43.48%)  14 (82.35%)  0.022 (OR=0.321; CI: 0.110–0.940) 
The length of ICU (days)  32.00  36.88  0.434 
The length of hospitals (days)  44.61  39.47  0.495 

PLT, blood platelet; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCT, Procalcitonin; MIC, Minimal Inhibitory Concentration.

In terms of clinical characteristics, APACHE II scores (18.83 versus 22.06, p=0.103) and Charlson comorbidity indexes (2.39 versus 2.52, p=0.808) on admission into ICU were similar in both early and delayed use groups. Likewise, similar SOFA scores (15.43 versus 14.47, p=0.293) and Pitt bacteremia scores (4.17 versus 3.41, p=0.679) indicate that the patients had the same clinical condition when bloodstream infections were diagnosed. Laboratory parameters, including white blood cell count, blood platelet count (PLT), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and serum bilirubin were also similar in the two groups. Other conditions that may affect prognosis, such as acute kidney injury (AKI), invasive procedures, immunosuppression, and septic shock were not significantly different in the two groups, indicating homogeneity in the severity of infection.

All isolates were resistant to meropenem and imipenem and sensitive to colistin. Nearly 27.5% of isolates were resistant to tigecycline. Although we used the most sensitive antibiotic, the overall lethality rate of CRKP bloodstream infections were still high. Twenty-four (60%) patients died, 10 (43.48%) patients with early administration of polymyxin B and 14 (82.35%) with delayed administration (p=0.022, OR=0.321; CI: 0.110–0.940). All patients accepted polymyxin B-based combination therapies. However, there was no difference between the three combinations with tigecycline, carbapenems, and amikacin. Compared with the delayed application, early use of polymyxin B showed greater bacterial clearance rate (65.22% versus 29.41%, p=0.025; OR=0.533; CI: 0.295–0.965) and reduced 30-day mortality (39.13% versus 70.59%, p=0.045; OR=0.461; CI: 0.199–0.989) and the overall mortality (43.48% versus 82.35%, p=0.022; OR=0.321; CI: 0.110–0.940). Fig. 2 shows the Kaplan–Meier curves of patients treated with early and delayed administration of polymyxin B (p=0.042). It should be pointed out that polymyxin B duration and total dosages in the two groups were similar (11.57 days versus 11.76 days, p=0.919; 1306.52mg versus 1247.06mg, p=0.711, respectively). Therefore, mortality was not correlated with longer treatment duration or higher dosage of polymyxin B. During the treatment, there were neither cases with detectable renal toxicity nor neurovirulence related to polymyxin B.

Fig. 2.

Kaplan–Meier curves of patients treated with early and delayed administration of polymyxin B.

(0.08MB).
Discussion

In our study, preemptive use of polymyxin B before blood culture results had better bacterial clearance and more favorable outcome in patients with BSI due to CRKP than delayed use of the drug.

Polymyxin B is an undisputed effective antibiotic choice for treating patients with CRKP bloodstream infections according to culture results. However, the limitations of traditional microbiological techniques in identifying bloodstream pathogens will delay treatment initiation of serious infections such as CRKP BSI. Furthermore, polymyxin B was only recently approved for entry into the Chinese market, and the price is exceedingly expensive. As a result, clinicians regard it as the last resort, preferring tigecycline or carbapenems, postponing the use of polymyxin B and unavoidably affecting prognosis. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez et al. observed that appropriate therapy starting up to five days after infection was associated with decreased mortality (OR=0.44) in patients with BSIs due to CPE.5

Early appropriate therapy (starting up to two days after infection) can also reduce mortality (OR=0.84). We defined early use of polymyxin B as administering it before blood culture results, which is analogous to empirical antibiotic treatment. In contrast, the delayed group can be considered as having received targeted antibiotic therapy.10 However, there is some difference between early use in our study and empirical treatment, as half of the patients (57.5%) had primary infection sites, such as the broncho-pulmonary and gastrointestinal tract. Once the infectious symptoms occurred, BSI due to CRKP prompted early targeted therapies first. Nonetheless, most patients with primary BSIs had high risk factors, including invasive procedures, immunosuppression and history of carbapenems use.11,12 Patients in the delayed use group also had high risk of CRKP infections, but other antibiotic regimens were chose owing to the refusal of the patients’ relatives and the availability of alternative regimens. The total treatment duration and dosages of polymyxin B were similar in the two groups. Therefore, the advantages of early administration cannot be attributed to these factors. We speculate that early application of polymyxin B can reach an effective blood concentration as quickly as possible and truncating the duration of bacteremia, eventually reducing the death rate.

The impact of the underlying conditions in mortality of critical patients presenting with CRKP bacteremia are vital and could outweight the influence of antibiotic therapy. We tried our best to balance the characteristics of patients to avoid confounding primary diseases by employing strict eligibility criteria, such as excluding patients with terminal disease, intracranial CRKP infections, and high APACHE II scores (>30 points).

Although an optimal regimen is yet to be defined, most studies have recommended polymyxin B-based combinations in instead of monotherapy to reduce mortality.2,4,5,13 In a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Mical Paul et al. polymyxin B combined with a carbapenem was not more effective than monotherapy in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, the main bacterium was CRAB rather than CRKP, and pneumonia and infections of other sites were included in this RCT, leading to great heterogeneity.14 In the study by Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez et al. polymyxin B was administered to 154 patients, half of them on monotherapy had a 30-day mortality of 54% (40/74), whereas those patients on polymyxin B-containing regimens had a 30-day mortality of 38% (28/74).5 Different combinations have been recommended as there are many possible treatment regimens. Carbapenem-containing regimens, as Daikos et al. reported, is among the most effective combinations.6 The survival rate was 52% with polymyxin B with carbapenems in our report, which was similar to the 50% synergy seen in vitro.15 In our study, polymyxin B was frequently combined with either a carbapenem, or tigecycline, or aminoglycosides. Two-thirds of patients received the combination of polymyxin B and a carbapenem, with a high mortality rate (61.11%). However, we cannot be able to draw any definitive conclusions because of the small sample sizes and nonsignificant statistical results. Our study has some limitations, such as the impacts of unmeasured variables and confounding factors due to the observational nature of the study.

Conclusion

We recommend early administration of polymyxin B-based combination therapy before blood culture results for patients with bloodstream infections due to CRKP. Irrespective of drug dosage and treatment duration, early use can effectively eliminate bacteria, improving 30-day and overall mortality.

Authors’ contributions

Qiqiang Liang collected and analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Zhijiang Xu assisted with the statistical analyses of the microorganisms. Man Huang reviewed and modified the draft of the manuscript.

Funding

No funding.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

Xin XU and Tingting Gen assisted in selecting the clinical data.

References
[1]
Y. Zhang, Q. Wang, Y. Yin
Epidemiology of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: report from China CRE Network
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, (2017),
[2]
J. Rodríguez-Baño, B. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, I. Machuca, A. Pascual
Treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-BetaLactamase-, AmpC-, and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae
Clin Microbiol Rev, (2018),
[3]
M. Tumbarello, E.M. Trecarichi, F.G. De Rosa
Infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: differences in therapy and mortality in a multicentre study
J Antimicrob Chemother, 70 (2015), pp. 2133-2143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv086
[4]
D.M. Jacobs, M.C. Safir, D. Huang, F. Minhaj, A. Parker, G.G. Rao
Triple combination antibiotic therapy for carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: a systematic review
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 16 (2017), pp. 76 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-017-0249-2
[5]
B. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, E. Salamanca, M. de Cueto
Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): a retrospective cohort study
Lancet Infect Dis, 17 (2017), pp. 726-734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30228-1
[6]
G.L. Daikos, S. Tsaousi, L.S. Tzouvelekis
Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: lowering mortality by antibiotic combination schemes and the role of carbapenems
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 58 (2014), pp. 2322-2328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02166-13
[7]
M. Singer, C.S. Deutschman, C.W. Seymour
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)
[8]
Institute CaLS
Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. M100 S28
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, (2018)
[9]
C. Giske
The European Committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing – EUCAST breakpoint tables
[10]
I. Martin-Loeches, M. Leone, K. Madach, C. Martin, S. Einav
Antibiotic therapy in the critically ill – expert opinion of the Intensive Care Medicine Scientific Subcommittee of the European Society of Anaesthesiology
Eur J Anaesthesiol, 34 (2017), pp. 215-220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000595
[11]
L. Xu, X. Sun, X. Ma
Systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality of patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 16 (2017), pp. 18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-017-0191-3
[12]
D.R. Giacobbe, V. Del Bono, P. Bruzzi
Previous bloodstream infections due to other pathogens as predictors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in colonized patients: results from a retrospective multicentre study
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 36 (2017), pp. 663-669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2843-1
[13]
I. Machuca, B. Gutierrez-Gutierrez, I. Gracia-Ahufinger
Mortality associated with bacteremia due to colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with high-level meropenem resistance: importance of combination therapy without colistin and carbapenems
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 61 (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00014-17
[14]
M. Paul, G.L. Daikos, E. Durante-Mangoni
Colistin alone versus colistin plus meropenem for treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: an open-label, randomised controlled trial
Lancet Infect Dis, 18 (2018), pp. 391-400
[15]
O. Zusman, T. Avni, L. Leibovici
Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro synergy of polymyxins and carbapenems
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 57 (2013), pp. 5104-5111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01230-13
Copyright © 2019. Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia
The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
Cookies policy
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.